Krakauer's statement that he will not be an impartial biographer tells the reader that he will be injecting his own thoughts and opinions into the story. Even though Krakauer has access to McCandless's journal and all of his belongings, Krakauer must make some assumptions or guesses as to McCandless's state of mind and motivations. Many biographers try to be impartial but it is impossible. The biographers make choices as to what about the person's life they include or leave out in the book. In this way, the biographer is not impartial because there is some element of a person's life missing that could change the way the person is seen. We can expect Krakauer to add his own thoughts and opinions about McCandless's actions. Krakauer also includes information about other hikers that have gone missing in the Alaska wilderness.
Answer:
in back of mermaids and back of ocean
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it mentions caring for an animals in question A
Answer:
A rising tension that gradually fades.
Explanation:
The beginning of the essay is a strong sentence that keeps adding elements of suspense as it develops, eventually making the sentence overloaded with information (especially considering that it is the first sentence of the essay). Nevertheless, the entire sentence seems to describe a single action.
The second sentence is a complex sentence that, in contrast to the first, has several smaller steps in the development of the plot. The steps are divided but complementary; they happen independently of each other and add to each other's meaning, at the same time.
