This is a hard one. But business people would make sense. As they're the ones who know how to get kids to want things. They put character's on food and things like that. That would make the most sense from what she's saying.
Answer:
The narrator refers to how, little by little, his sister and him stopped thinking about losing parts of their house, as if it didn´t bother them anymore. To live without thinking is to consciously ignore the bad things.
Explanation:
The idea of not confronting the opposing forces in this story has been interpreted as an anti-Peronism symbol, due to Cortázar´s having been fired from his professorship after Perón became President of Argentina.
Answer:
Ethos Or even Pathos.
Explanation:
Ethos - I believe this excerpt pertains to the activists writing about the world leaders and their movement/ actions towards gender equality, what they've essentially done so far. It would seem that the world leaders' actions towards this subject is slow and slow seems unacceptable to these activists. Such a background is low standard
Pathos - As read from the activists, there is a sense of frustration in their speech. Slow action of the world leaders on gender equality fuel this frustration as the activists claim, they've "promised" to quicken it's process. Also, based on only the line "this is unacceptable", it exhibits the passion had on the subject.
I’d say courageous! if he’s arguing with his brother but then pretending to be focused on schoolwork, he should be quite brave, especially with his mum a few feet away.
