Congress passed the removal bill that May, and by September Jackson had begun negotiating with the Chickasaws, the Choctaws and the remaining Creeks to move west. Within four years they would be under land cession treaties or on the move. Some Seminoles also left in the early 1830s, and others fought the Army in Florida for several years. But Ross refused even to meet with Jackson. Instead, he turned to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to invalidate Georgia’s removal law.
As the court’s spring session opened in March 1831, Georgia officials roamed the Capitol to rally states’ rights advocates to the idea of stripping the justices of their power to review the acts of state governments. The justices—in an act that historians would say reflected their worry over the talk coming out of Congress—ruled that they lacked jurisdiction over the Cherokees’ claims against Georgia. Chief Justice John Marshall offered their only hope when he wrote that “the Indians are acknowledged to have an unquestionable...right to the lands they occupy.”
This one I think is D, rule of law but not 100% certain. Comment after so others will know if correct or not.
Due to the Mit'a system, the public service system flourished greatly during in Europe during the period c. 1450-c.1750.
The Mit'a system was invented by the Inca government. Once a person turned fifteen, they were obliged to participate in the Mit'a until they turned fifty. All the people worked for the government for a given period, and this labor was free to the government.
Enormous construction of highways, the Emperor and nobles' house, monuments, temples, bridges, and mines were possible due to the Mit'a system. This is because people in the Inca period worked only 65 days a year for their basic necessities. The other extra time they had could thus be used for free service to the government.
Learn more about the Mit'a system:
brainly.com/question/10113738
#SPJ4
