Answer: First, we understand that he is incredibly arrogant. He is directly warned by the experienced old-timer that the weather he is attempting to travel in is completely unsuitable. Despite his inexperience, however, he chooses not to listen to the warning, considering himself above the advice.
Second, we know that the man is completely out of touch with nature. The brazen confidence of the man is contrasted by the worry and fear of his dog, who is in touch with nature enough to know that traveling is a bad idea. In the end, nature defeats the man due to his underestimation of it.
Explanation: The final passage of the story contrasts the man’s death with the stunningly beautiful natural world, which is also cold and indifferent. The dog’s eventual departure from the man’s body shows that humans are interchangeable in its mind, another example of the indifference of nature. The dog survives and the man does not, showing the triumph of instinct over rationality.
Answer: John Adams (1735-1826) was a leader of the American Revolution and served as the second U.S. president from 1797 to 1801. ... In the 1780s, Adams served as a diplomat in Europe and helped negotiate the Treaty of Paris (1783), which officially ended the American Revolutionary War (1775-83).
Explanation:
The correct answers are:
c. They irrigated dry land to expand their farmlands.
- The Sumerians used the advantages of the mother nature that were on their disposal, so the two big rivers, Tigris and Euphrates rivers, were used for irrigation of the dry land, thus managing to expand their farmlands and produce more food.
d. They used oxen-drawn plows and seed funnels to plant crops more quickly and easily.
- The oxen-drawn plows and seed funnels were very important inventions which enabled the processes of planting and working on the farmlands much more easier and quicker, plus it required less human effort because the oxen were the ones that performed the hard physical part.
D) Campaign contributions.
The question pertains to selecting heads of departments in government positions. Relying on campaign contributions as a factor would essentially mean individuals were buying their way into government positions.
Obviously abilities and professional experience matter the most. Ethnicity ought not be a consideration in a prejudicial manner. But if government agencies are going to represent well the various constituencies of the American public, those making government appointments will take care to consider qualified minority candidates to serve as department heads.
