Relating these to Australian slang words, if "banger" relates to a sausage, then "cocky" would be short for a cockatoo. A cockatoo is a bird that is a native to Australia. Though "cocky" may also mean someone who is overconfident in a bossy way, seeing as how banger is used as a slang word, cocky as a cockatoo is more fitting.
<h2>
<em>Simple </em><em>past </em><em>tense</em></h2>
<em>sub+</em><em>v^</em><em>2</em><em>+</em><em>obj</em>
- <em>Ne</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>ti</em><em>v</em><em>e</em>
<em>Sub+</em><em>did </em><em>not+</em><em>v1+</em><em>obj</em>
<em>Did+</em><em>sub+</em><em>v1+</em><em>obj?</em>
<em>Wh+</em><em>did+</em><em>sub+</em><em>v1+</em><em> </em><em>obj?</em>
<em>obj+</em><em>was/</em><em>were+</em><em>V3+</em><em>by+</em><em>sub</em>
<h2>
<em>The </em><em>simple </em><em>past </em><em>is </em><em>used:</em></h2>
- <em>To </em><em>denote </em><em>completed</em><em>/</em><em>finished </em><em>event </em><em>or </em><em>situation</em><em> </em><em>with </em><em>a </em><em>last </em><em>time </em><em>reference</em>
- <em>To </em><em>express </em><em>past </em><em>facts </em><em>or </em><em>generalizations </em><em>or </em><em>situations </em><em>which </em><em>are </em><em>no </em><em>longer </em><em>true</em>
- <em>A </em><em>series </em><em>of </em><em>completed </em><em>action </em><em>in </em><em>the </em><em>past</em>
- <em>Duration</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>any </em><em>completed</em><em> </em><em>action </em><em>Which</em><em> </em><em>starts </em><em>and </em><em>stops </em><em>in </em><em>the </em><em>past.</em>
- <em>With </em><em>adverbs </em><em>of </em><em>time:</em>
<em>yesterday,</em><em>ago,</em><em>last </em><em>week,</em><em> </em><em>last </em><em>month,</em><em>just </em><em>now,</em><em>in </em><em>the </em><em>past </em><em>etc.</em><em>.</em>
- <em>With </em><em>when </em><em>clause(</em><em>before </em><em>event)</em>
<h2>
<em>Hope </em><em>it </em><em>helps</em></h2>
<em>Good </em><em>luck</em><em> on</em><em> your</em><em> assignment</em><em> </em>
C: <span>
The nobles had again sought to make themselves as powerful as possible.
In the passage, it explains that under Stephen the nobles had experienced a ton of power (the author uses the word exorbitant which shows how extremely privileged their lives were), but that Henry the Second then took a lot of their power away. Now, they are resuming their former positions (from under Stephen) to a point where they are becoming as powerful as possible.</span>
Answer:
I think you have the right answer
Explanation:
Answer:
Found
Explanation:
I think but I'm not for sure. that is all I can think of
