The best answer to this question would be (A) True.
This is because culture will impact how your potential customers view your product. Even in the same country, different approaches should be used if the cultural divide is too vast between one area to the other.
An approach that works, for example, for urban customers in New York City, might not work with another set of urban customers based in Tokyo. Recognizing what works for each market means that you will be able to reap the best outcome possible from all of them.
Answer:
d. $141,000
Explanation:
As the following information is given
Purchase of raw material = $165,000
Beginning Raw material balance = $22,000
Completed direct material = $141,000
Completed indirect material = $13,000
Since the work in progress includes only direct material i.e $141,000 as indirect material is allocated to the overhead account. Therefore, only $141,000 of raw material is transferred to work in process account
So other information which is mentioned is ignored
Answer:
Net purchases:
= Purchases - Purchase Returns and Allowances - Purchase Discount
= 500,000 - 14,000 - 9,000
= $477,000
Cost of goods sold:
= Net purchase + Freight-in
= 477,000 + 15,000
= $492,000
Answer:
The labor would increase
Explanation:
When the government decides to lower the income tax in the coming year, which is financed by the findings of a large as well as a previously unknown warehouse for real goods, then there would be an increase in the labor as the reduction in the income tax would cause more and more investment. And thus organizations and firms increase their efficiencies and create more and more output by increasing the labor.
Answer:
Violated employees personal compact.
Explanation:
The manager at Seasons Hotel wanted to change the incentive system to offer bonuses tied to the hotel's financial performance, but the employees refused to comply. This example shows that the manager has violated employees personal compact which is defined as the formal, social and psychological aspects of the relationships between the workers and the organization. It is termed as the mutual commitments and obligations which are stated and implied between the employer and the employee. Here, the manager has broken and violated that implicitly set rules when he has tried to tie the incentive system with the financial performance of the Hotel which workers can think that will be difficult to get if the Hotel doesn't not perform well.
