Answer:
This is an example of inductive reasoning because the conclusion is not decisive and it may or may not be true
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that <span> Paul Helm remembers everything that had happen, it leads to the arrest of the suspects.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
I think it is a NOUN. hope i am right!
I believe it is D. Injuries to the brain tissue.
Answer:
D. <u><em>Revise the entire sentence so it reads: Though it is mind-boggling, people maintain their enthusiasm about snow; however, for me, it's nothing more than a commonplace experience.</em></u>
Explanation:
The revised sentence above is more objective and formal for academic writing. Although both sentences talk about a personal opinion, the second version is more academic because it establishes the opinion of others first and then it introduces the personal opinion, that makes it more objective. Moreover, the original sentence has too many informal elements, while the second option proves to be more fit for academic writing.
Option A = WRONG because although contractions are not usually allowed in academic writing, they can be used and besides, this option does not completely answer the question, we need to change more things to make it right for academic writing.
Option B = WRONG because the sentence is written in simple present.
Option C = WRONG because if we eliminate "it always amazes me when" the rest of the sentence doesn't make sense, it would read "People get excited about snow because for me, it's commonplace"