Hm, this is not an easy question.
Generally the best way to prevent a nuclear disaster is not to have any weapons, so A would be a good option. But in the modern world, complete destruction of all weapons is not feasible, and people believe that since US and Russia limited their number of weapons, this is no longer such a big concern (option D, which is I think the best. Personally, however I faviour A as a solution to the problem of nuclear weapons).
The answer is False.
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein actually received great support from the Washington Post on this topic. Their first story about the Watergate break-in was just the beginning, as they would go on to write countless articles about President Nixon and his connection to his event. This made Woodward and Bernstein household names and also made the Washington Post a wildly popular newspaper.
I need Context. was it for the Slave Trade, Or trading, or Pirates.
Answer:The largest reason why immigration is an economic issue boils down to resource management. Every country has limited and accounted for resources which it used to distribute as evenly as possible to it's citizens and has laws in place to keep that balance in place so as to not disrupt that countries overall economy. But when you begin to allow the influx of immigrants into a country, those resources can become to be too far stretched thin and therefore leave an issue for the citizens of that set country. For example, if a country has corn as their main food resource and it uses that corn to evenly distribute among it's citizens, it has taken into account how much corn is needed to produce each year so that way the country at sustainable levels. But if there was to be an influx of immigrants and too many people began coming into that set country, yet the government and it's own people were not adequately prepared to produce more corn than is needed for the influx of immigrants, than that can lead to inflation prices on the corn, shortage of food, etc.
Explanation:
