The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
I believe the answer is: <span>It could not be reduced to its basic elements
Phi phenomenon refers to the optical illusion that make a person see a series of non-moving image as if it's making a motion if it's seen in rapid succession. This indicates that the perception is created from the combination of many sense at once</span>
The quality of the arguments becomes a more important determinant of persuasion.
To me, this looks correct. Is this the format you were supposed to use? If it is then yes it is correct.
The purpose of adminstraion of international law is the right to protect ones place.
