I found this on line hope it helps
<span>The narrator arrives on the premises expecting that Roderick will be ill given the letter that he previously received from him. He says that the letter itself speaks to the nervous agitation that Roderick must be experiencing and expects that Roderick will not be in his right mind. When the narrator finally makes contact with Roderick he is absolutely shocked by the changes that Roderick's appearance has undergone. Roderick greets the narrator with such "vivacious" warmth that the narrator is taken aback, questioning the sincerity of the greeting. However, upon looking more carefully at Roderick the narrator is reassured of the genuineness of his expression and settles down to take in Roderick's full appearance. Upon examining Roderick's face, the narrator is shocked at the dramatic shift in the narrator's boyhood good looks, comparing Roderick to a wasting away corpse but still maintaining some of the natural appealing qualities which he once bore. It is clear that Roderick was once a vivacious and attractive individual but now suffers from great anxiety and misery given his condition. In fact, the narrator is so surprised by Roderick's current condition that he doubts the fact that it is the same person that he once knew. Moreover, Roderick's actions add to the perplexing nature of Roderick's appearance. The narrator describes Roderick's inconsistent behavior as being full of life at one moment and absolutely sullen the next. This strange behavior reinforces previous characterizations of Roderick as anxiety-ridden and ill, which is a dramatic shift from his previous character. </span>
Answer: Both poems find a link between farming and the act of writing
Explanation:
Your question isn't complete. The question asked is:
What common concern do these poems share?
The common concern shared by the poems is that both poems find a link between farming and the act of writing.
From the poems, it can be seen that the writer linked farming with writing as words such as potato, pen, spade were some of the words used to show the link.
Answer:
They do something worse than physical harm.
Explanation:
Instead of just killing or maiming people they ruin the spirit and morale of a person, it effects them mentally rather than physically.
A thesis statement might be sturdy if it meets the following criteria.
Limited Subject- the announcement narrows down the subject of study to a totally unique vicinity. For instance, it may address volunteering amongst university college students or seniors. From the declaration, the reader has to robotically know the route you are taking with the dialogue. Generalizations of the idea of volunteering with not bypass the test of a sturdy thesis announcement.
Write about Thesis.
A thesis, or dissertation (abbreviated diss.), is a report submitted with the help of candidature for an educational degree or expert qualification presenting the author's research and findings. In a few contexts, the word "thesis" or a cognate is used for a part of a bachelor's or grasp's path, even as "dissertation" is generally carried out to a doctorate. This is the standard association in American English. In other contexts, inclusive inside most institutions of the UK and Republic of Ireland, the reverse is actual. The time period graduate thesis is occasionally used to consult both grasp's theses and doctoral dissertations.
To know more about the Thesis, refer: brainly.com/question/14345618
#SPJ9
Answer:
Explanation:
On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.
Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.
As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.
But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.
