1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
____ [38]
3 years ago
10

Imagine that archaeologists found one of the following new pieces of evidence. Which one suggests that the theory that early hum

ans came to the Americas from the Siberian region is not true? Archaeologists discovered signs of green landscapes and bodies of water in the regions where the early humans from Siberia first landed. Archaeologists discovered the presence of animals such as deer and rabbits before the arrival of early humans from Siberia. Archaeologists discovered barren land and infertile soil in the Americas before the arrival of early humans from Siberia. Archaeologists discovered evidence of travel between Asia and the Americas before the arrival of early humans from Siberia.
History
1 answer:
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]3 years ago
3 0
<span><span>Archaeologists discovered evidence of travel between Asia and the Americas before the arrival of early humans from Siberia.

</span>
<em>This statement suggests that the early humans do not come from the Siberian region but from Asia. In terms of human geography, history, culture and language, Siberia belongs to Russia. And Russia belongs to both Asia and Europe. Therefore, Siberia partly belongs to Asia and partly Europe. </em>
</span><em>In reality, archaeologists did discover evidence of travel when the indigenous people of the Americas found distant genetic links common with people of Australia and Papua New Guinea with the small groups of people in the Amazonian region of South America. </em><span>

</span>

Having discovered signs of green landscapes and bodies of water is a useless evidence. It could have been there since the beginning of time. Those landscapes could be a natural landform. Therefore, this evidence would just to point to no one has ever inhabited Americas at this moment of time.

Deer and rabbits are present in Siberia, therefore, this would just point to this region evidently.

Barren lands and infertile soil would mean no one had ever settled in this place. If there was, it wouldn’t have been barren and infertile. 


You might be interested in
Some of the earliest settlements were located near which types of natural resources?
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

water/ocean the closer you were it was easier for merchants and trades to go from (Europe I'm guessing) to the New World (also guessing) also good farm land to plant crops for food (the south was popular because it didn't get too cold in the winter and the soil was good/fertile and not rocky)

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please answer this pleases!!!!!
OleMash [197]

the Committee of Public Safety thought monopolies was such a great crime because of the fact that it took so many homes off sale in so other people couldn't buy houses that they wanted.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Founders who supported natural rights also supported adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because :
Arturiano [62]

4) the Bill of Rights included specific rights for people.

Though the Constitution stated natural rights would be protected and there were limitations on the government, nothing was stated specifically. Those supporting the Bill of Rights were fearful that without specifically stated rights, the government would eventually strip people of their rights.

The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments is the Constitution and were passed after the Constitution was passed. The amendments spell out specific rights citizens have and the government is required to protect.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Valley Forge showcase General George Washington’s leadership?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

In December 1777, 12,000 men of Washington's continental army marched in Valley Forge to escape the British who had just captured the capital of the revolutionary state, Philadelphia. What followed was a brutal winter that should have decimated the army but instead the opposite happened, they came out stronger. This, was as a result of Washington's leadership and the tactics of Friedrich Wilhelm Baron von Steuben.

But what made Washington so effective;

  • Inspirational/ Motivational

George Washington was an inspirational leader who throughout the war managed to inspire and motivate his troops and when this was massively needed in Valley Forge, he did not falter. His army had been defeated time and again and now were in a very precarious position yet they did not desert and break apart. This was because Washington was able to inspire them and just as he did in the battle at Monmouth, he did again here.

In the camp, Washington also initiated some recreational activities to keep the spirits of the men up such as theatre. At Valley Forge Washington had Addison’s play “Cato” acted.  

  • Effective

As soon as they arrived at Valley Forge George Washington did not waste time in getting the camp organized. Within days it was reported that over 1,600 log huts had been built with Washington even giving exact measurements for the houses. Roads and trenches were also built such that the place looked like a small city.

  • Tactical

Even the choosing of Valley Forge as their base was a show of his leadership abilities because Washington proved his tactical mantle when he picked this location. It was chosen such that Philadelphia was close enough to watch the British and yet far enough that the British could not launch a surprise attack.

  • Willing to accept help

Some leaders are too proud to accept help but George Washington was not like that. When the Prussian officer Friedrich Wilhelm Baron von Steuben offered to transform the Americans into a solid and modern fighting force, he did not let pride get in his way but rather support the Prussian who then went on the make the men of the Continental army, a brilliant modern force.

Washington marched into Valley Forge with some people doubting his leadership acumen and even thinking of replacing him but marched out of Valley Forge at the head of an army that supported him and could not wait to beat the British under him. This on its own is perhaps the greatest showcase of his leadership.

6 0
3 years ago
The fundamental difference between Hoover and Roosevelt was what?
Makovka662 [10]
The answer is answer a
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 100 points to Help Me!!
    6·2 answers
  • How were japan and china similar to each other
    11·1 answer
  • Muhammad managed a caravan business in Mecca before he became known for the introduction of Islam.
    8·1 answer
  • 1.   Concerned about the Catholic minority in Maryland, Leonard Calvert ordered the Second Lord Baltimore to 
    8·2 answers
  • What was the main factor that helped the Meiji restoration prevent the colonization of Japan?
    5·1 answer
  • Who has tiktok?????????????????????
    11·2 answers
  • Describe how the Executive Branch has power over the Judicial Branch?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Federalist Party lose support after the War of 1812?
    10·1 answer
  • I really need this, so don't just answer for the points!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • What was the role of Georgia's governor?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!