This excerpt comes from the story “<u><em>The Crab that Played by the Sea”</em></u> written by Rudyard Kipling. It is a fable to teach children about the origin of life.
Question: Which evidence best supports the conclusion that the narrator is telling this story with a particular child in mind?
Answer: D. “Pau Amma’s babies hate being taken out of their little Pusat Taseks and brought home in pickle-bottles. That is why they nip you with their scissors, and it serves you right!”
In novels the falling action is often followed by the resolution (the ending)
The American writer Joyce Carol Oates, published "<em>Against Nature</em>" in 1988, an essay criticizing how nature is portrait and romanticized in literature; suggesting instead not take anything for granted.
She realizes that her body is a potpourri of complex structures inhabited by her conscience, and comments that "<em>the “I” doesn’t exist</em>".
Answer:
D
Explanation:
you need all of those for a conclusion.
Are there supposed to be options for the question? If not, let me know!
