Answer:
Views on the Dream act and political ideology do not seem to be independent.
Explanation:
The mosaic plot displays that Liberals are more likely to encourage the act compared to Moderates and Conservatives. It is evident by the fact that the bar representing Liberals supporting the ideology covers more area compared to the other two parties and this is something that makes the viewpoints on the dream act and political ideology far from independent.
Answer:
B) No fallacy.
Explanation:
In this example, the speaker is using the authority of Professor Stevens as a way to justify the claim he is making. This is an appeal to authority, and there is no consensus as to whether this is a valid claim or a fallacy. Some authors consider this a valid claim, as the authority is a legitimate expert in the subject. Other authors consider it a fallacy, and it receives the name of <em>argumentum ad verecundiam</em>. This is based on the idea that even an expert can be wrong, and therefore, this is not an appropriate source of evidence.
<span>a. a deliberate act that is harmful to the child's physical, emotional, or sexual well-being</span>