When the author says in lines 40–41 that “I'm convinced the past we must contend with is deeper even than speech,” he means that

1 answer:

6 0

It seems that you missed the given choices of the question above which are the following:
A. the past is not something we can talk about.
B. there are no words to convey the pain of the past.
C. The battle of the sexes will go on forever.
D. Men’s and women’s roles are deeply rooted in our species.
Anyway, the correct answer for the given question above would be option D. When the author says in lines 40–41 that “I'm convinced the past, we must contend with is deeper even than speech,” he means that Men’s and women’s roles are deeply rooted in our species. Hope this answer helps.

You might be interested in

Read the passage. During the 1930s, extreme drought and high winds made life incredibly difficult in the Great Plains region of

I am Lyosha [343]

Hey There!

Here is your answer:

Your answer is "During the 1930s, extreme drought and high winds made life incredibly difficult in the Great Plains region of the United States."

Is sentence tells that during the 1930s there were extreme droughts which made life difficult then it goes on about facts about the drought and what happened!

Hope this helps!

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Oppression against people who make less money is called?

Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

A. Classism

Explanation:

B C and D are tied to nationality, skin color, and gender.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Every child has right to choose their own career n live their dream

Vitek1552 [10]

Answer & Explanation:

yep true! Thanks and have a great day! ^_^

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What would you add or change about the anthem? If you don't want to change or add anything, you still have to explain why you ha

Svetlanka [38]

Answer: Varies

Explanation: I would make it more inclusive.

3 0

2 years ago

using the library or the internet as a resource, locate and watch Two different interpretations of the crucible. you may choose

ololo11 [35]

Answers: Eric Christ's interpretation: Key points: Direct link to Mc Carthy, easily understood, "Witch Hunt", Realized that it was link to "un-American trials", "statement of unlimited power wielded by apparently well-meaning albeit paranoid and delusional individuals.

Wade Bradford's interpretation: Key points: Shows no link to Joseph Mc Carthur, believes the facts written were directly about the puritan people in Salen Massachussetes.

Explanation: In the first interpretation there is a strong link to Joseph McCarthy but in the other there is no link. From my point of view, the interpretation that changes the original idea is the second because this play should be understood in the context in which it was written and that was a moment that McCarthysm untied a truly witch hunt in American's society

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers