Answer:
consumer surplus = $3.5
producer surplus = $2
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Consumer surplus = willingness to pay – price of the good
Jeff's consumer surplus = $7 - $6 = $1
Samir's consumer surplus = $8.50 - $6 = $2.50
total consumer surplus = $1 + $2.50 = $3.50
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product
Producer surplus = price – least price the seller is willing to accept
Manufacturer 1's producer surplus = $6 - $4.5 = $1.50
Manufacturer 2's producer surplus = $6 - $5.50 = $0.50
total producer surplus = $1.50 + 0.50 = $2
Answer:
functional job analysis.
Explanation:
Functional job analysis can be regarded as the analysis used in the knowing information as far as a job is concerned , this could based on employee's behavior which could be used to give the decription of the job.It should be noted that job analysis approach that utilizes an inventory of various types of work activities that can constitute any job is functional job analysis.
Explanation:
Qualitative analysis;
The given case belongs to real options in finance terms where the project offers tangible assets in comparison to financial instruments.
The project is of real option. The value of any real option would be more when:
- the project under consideration is very risky
- With respect to timing option value, there is time to change the decisions
Having said that, since project is risky and investment can be made later, hence it would be more feasible to wait and observe
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
