The period of time between the years 1350 and 1550 is called the renaissance
Answer:
This would be a simple situation of a brother following his older sibling.
Explanation:
I've seen this before.
Even though Isaiah has been taught by his teachers and/or parents not to use drugs, he will try it if he sees his brother trying it without the consequences he has heard of from his teachers and/or parents.
Unless the older sibling has done anything wrong in the younger sibling's eyes, the younger sibling will always look up to his older brother/sister. Even if the younger brother has been taught over and over again not to do something because of the horrid consequences that come with it, he will do it if he sees his brother doing the same without the consequences specified.
In other words : If the older brother hasn't been caught by anyone for using drugs, the younger brother will follow suit, or at least try to do the same.
Hope this helps.
Since Marbury, the Supreme Court has greatly expanded the power of judicial review. ... It is difficult to overstate the effect that Marbury and its progeny have had on the American legal system. A comprehensive list of important cases that have struck down federal or state statutes would easily reach four digits.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
