Answer:
Cuba's Communist government has survived more than 50 years of US sanctions intended to topple veteran leader Fidel Castro.It also defied predictions that it would not survive the collapse of its one-time supporter, the Soviet Union.Since the fall of the US-backed dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista in 1959, Cuba has been a one-party state led by Mr Castro and - since February 2008 - by his chosen successor and younger brother, Raul. Fidel Castro exercised control over virtually all aspects of Cuban life through the Communist Party and its affiliated mass organisations, the government bureaucracy and the state security apparatus.Exploiting the Cold War, Fidel Castro was for decades able to rely on strong Soviet backing, including annual subsidies worth $4-5 billion, and succeed in building reputable health and education systems. But, at least partly because of the US trade sanctions, he failed to diversify the economy. Please give me the brainliest answer?
:) Hoped this helped!!! Have a good day!!! <3
of course they are much better of one nation rather than 2...If they could just reunite to each other and reconsider their differences that would be great.
The correct answer is <span>c) the no-third-term rule
There was never an official no-third-term rule in the United States when it was found. All future presidents just retired after two terms because that's how Washington did it. It was only after the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt that they decided to introduce it as an official rule since he won the presidency four times.</span>
<u><em>The Cold War</em></u> is your answer
Hope this helps:D
Have a great rest of a brainly day!
Answer:worst offender, a dirty energy source that produces less than half our electricity but nearly 80 percent of all power plant carbon emissions.
The good news is that coal is on the decline. Many old and inefficient coal plants are closing down and essentially no new coal plants are being built in the US, a trend that is driving the largest transformation of the US electricity system in half a century.
The energy choices we make during this pivotal moment will carry huge consequences for our health, our climate, and our economy for decades to come.
Right now we are moving toward a natural gas-dominated electricity system, but an over-reliance on natural gas has significant risks and is not a long-term solution to our energy needs. Like coal, it is a fossil fuel that generates substantial global warming emissions, and has other health, environmental, and economic risks.
There's a better, cleaner way to meet our energy needs. Renewable energy resources like wind and solar power generate electricity with little or no pollution and global warming emissions—and could reliably and affordably provide up to 40 percent of US electricity by 2030, and 80 percent by 2050.
To create a cleaner, safer, and healthier energy future, it's time to choose renewables first.
Explanation:
