In operant conditioning, <span>adding something to decrease the likelihood of behavior is called: positive punishment
people tend to avoid something if we associate that thing with something that have negative effect to us.
For example, If you add a punishment every time a child leave their toy without returning it to the box, the child will be less likely to repeat that action in the future</span>
Answer:
Ethical problem
Explanation:
Every individual approaches ethical problem from his or her own perspective, which includes cultural values, moral upbringing, present circumstances, society’s expectations, and a multitude of few other variables.
Answer:
review the topic and what the prompt asks for
think of an argument or an opinion if necessary
consider what I know and what I need to know
Explanation:
Answer:
1. A
2. B
Explanation:
Operant conditioning can be defined as an associative learning process which involves reinforcing the strength of a behavior. Thus, the outcome depends on the response in operant conditioning.
A reinforcement of a desired behavior involves the process of strengthening a positive behavior being exhibited by an individual through the use of stimulus. Therefore, making the behavior to be exhibited in the future by the individual.
1. Escape conditioning: A mosquito is biting your arm and you slap it. You are more likely to slap mosquitos biting your arm in future. An escape conditioning can be defined as a type of conditioning in which a subject such as a human learn how to avoid a stimulus that is aversive i.e the aversive stimulus is eliminated by the occurrence of the stimulus.
2. Avoidance conditioning: A mosquito is flying around you and so you slap it so that it does not bite you. You are more likely to slap at mosquitos flying around you in future. An avoidance conditioning can be defined as a type of conditioning in which the occurrence of the behavior prevents the aversive stimulus.
Answer:
Whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
Explanation:
The antipositivism proposes that social science researchers must first be aware that the concepts, ideas and language of research shape their perception of the social world under investigation. On the other hand, positivism believes that a theory can only be taken for granted if it is proven from valid scientific techniques.
According to these concepts, we can conclude that the difference between positivism and antipositivism is better represented by the option: "whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
".
