Enron's complex financial statements were confusing to shareholders and analysts. Its complex business model and unethical practices required that the company use limitations to misrepresents earnings and modify the balance sheet to indicate favorable performance. the combination of these issues later resulted to bankruptcy.
Answer:
The Tet Offensive, a surprise attack launched by North Vietnam in the pre-dawn hours of Jan. 31, 1968, was a major turning point in the war
Explanation:
hope that help
Answer:
C. in Powhatan Confederacy territory.
Explanation:
The first permanent settlement of the English immigrants in America was in the Colony of Virginia, called the Jamestown colony. This area was named after the James River, where the small island was situated.
The colony of Jamestown occupied land that belonged to the Powhatan Confederacy territory. And during the time the English settlers first arrived, the confederacy was under the leadership of the chief Wahunsenacawh, who is on the same level as the modern-day political leader.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
Huh I don’t speak your language
