The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be 3.3 percent (3.3%). <span>In 2010, the poorest 20% of american families earned 3.3% of the country's total income for the year. Other options in this question include 25%, 50.2%, 65.5% and 85%. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>
A) Anti-Catholic could be used to characterize "Calles' Law" of the following options mentioned above. Calles Law was a statute enacted by the then President of Mexico, whose last name was Calles, where he re-enforced Article 130, which stated that church and state should be separate, but this largely entailed prohibiting priests and ministers from having certain inherently human rights.
The "new industrial order" was a time in the mid and late 1800s where cities developed form small villages as people immigrated to America for the jobs and freedom it offered.
19th century: The American expansion was guided by the concept of <em>Manifest Destiny</em>, being that the people of the time believed it was their fate to expand and colonize the rest of the territory (that became what is now the U.S.), whilst pushing forward their virtues and institutions, with the urge to do so being irresistible to them.
20th century: The expansion of this period (that actually started in the final years of the century before) was called <em>Imperialism</em>, where the idea of gaining overseas territories, expanding American influence on international market by expanding their industry and trade.
Similarities and differences: In both periods there was an interest in expanding American territories, although the ideologies behind those movements where different: in the former the belief of forming a great country through force of will was their core motive; conflicts with other nations and cultures were consequences rather than the motif. In the later the economic and power interest where the reasons for doing so; the expansion had many morally questionable sub-tones, such as racism and an exaggerated me-before-you approach to all, with conflict and war being promoted by one president of the time (Theodore Roosevelt).
Answer: Devshirma and slavery have both similarities and differences.
Explanation:
The Ottomans practiced Devshirma as a forcible abduction of Christian boys into the elite Ottoman army ranks. These boys were taken from their families and were enlisted in the elite Ottoman military ranks. Slavery, in itself, is a violent process of alienating people for forced labor. If we look at these definitions, they are similar in themselves. A slave could get his freedom in certain situations, but he always remained a slave during the service.
On the other hand, officials in the Ottoman Empire who found themselves in the state under the means of devshirme could advance in the service. There were many examples when people who became residents of the Ottoman Empire came to the country's highest positions. The Grand Ottoman Vizier Mehmed Pasha Sokolović had just arrived in the Ottoman capital, Constantinople, with a devshirme. He advanced so much in the service that after the sultan, he was the second man of the bulky Ottoman Empire. The very title of Grand Vizier in the empire implied that position.
