Answer:
The correct statement related to the pro forma statements is:
The addition to retained earnings is equal to net income less cash dividends.
Explanation:
When the beginning retained earnings are increased by the addition to retained earnings, it means that the cash dividends have been subtracted from the net income. This addition is the leftover net income after offsetting the dividends. It increases the retained earnings by the end of the financial period.
Answer:
$2,000
Explanation:
Revenue is the income generated from normal business activities. This includes allowances, discounts and deductions for sales returned.
Since Boogie and Twenties modify the agreement to reduce the price of the remaining 300 pair of flapper shoes to $10 a pair, it means that revenue to be recognized from the date of the change will be recognized at a unit price of $10.
As such if Boogie delivers 200 pairs of shoes in September,
Revenue to be recognized in the Month of September
= 200 * $10
= $2,000
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity and a fall in equilibrium price.
Explanation:
A normal good is a good whose demand increases when income increases and falls when income falls.
If income falls and the good is a normal good, demand would fall. This would lead to a fall in price and quantity.
If cost of input falls, the cost of production would fall and supply would increase. This would lead to an increase in quantity and a fall in price.
The combined effect would an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity and a fall in equilibrium price.
I hope my answer helps you
