Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
The tone of this excerpt from Maureen Daly's famous story "Sixteen" is primarily intimate, but also frank, sentimental, chatty, colloquial, and a little bit impassioned. The narrator is describing, informally and enthusiastically, a casual, but seemingly very cherished, encounter with a boy, and she appears to be very comfortable sharing her intimate feelings with her interlocutor, judging by some of her expressions - "don't be silly, I told you before, I get around," "Don't you see? This was different," or "It was all so lovely."
D. A conversation between two characters is called a "Dialogue".
Dilemma: having to make a difficult decision between (usually 2) options, “I was in a dilemma because I couldn’t decide whether to snack now or eat a big dinner later.”, problem, predicament, difficulty
feebly: in a way that is weak or lacks strength, “My grandma feebly walked into the kitchen.”, awkwardly, clumsily.
persistent: to be dedicated to doing something and trying repeatedly, “The toddler was persistent while trying to stand up.”, dedicated, constancy
recoiled: to move back in fear, disgust, or horror, “She recoiled at the sight of the bug.”, flinch, wince
roused: to be woken up, “He roused from his nap after a couple hours.”, awaken, stimulate
skewed: to move out of tune, “Their face skewed as they began to cry.”, squint, slope, asymmetrical
summon: to bring someone to you urgently, “He summoned their dog with a treat.”, invite, call for
vastness: something of a large size (usually empty), “She looked upon the vast ocean at the beach.”, empty, big
hope these helped!! good luck with school and remember to take care of yourself :)
Hello. You didn't attach the poem or even say the title of the poem, which makes it impossible for me to answer your question accurately, but I will help you as much as I can by showing you how to find your answer.
The simile makes comparisons between elements that have different contexts, but that has a characteristic between both that can be related creating a new meaning and concept between one of these elements. In other words, the simile aims to show a concept shared between two different elements. This type of comparison, within a poem, can create a message pattern, where the entire poem is aimed at maintaining the tone that the simile projected during the comparison.
An example of this can be seen in the phrase "My heart fell in life like a star wounded by a hunter's arrow," where the hunter's heart and arrow are different elements, but promote the feeling of pain and sadness when compared.
