Answer: $80 million per year for 25 years
Explanation:
The option you should choose is one that will guarantee you the highest present value.
This means that you need to discount the annual payment of $80 million per year for 25 years to find the present value. As you did not include a rate, we shall assume a rate of 8% for reference purposes.
The annual payment is an annuity so the present value can be calculated by:
Present value of annuity = Annuity payment * Present value interest factor, rate, no. of years
= 80,000,000 * Present value interest factor, 8%, 25 years
= 80,000,000 * 10.6748
= $853,984,000
<em>The present value of the annual payment is more than the present value of the $850 million received today so the Annual payment should be taken. </em>
Answer:
Write convert() method to cast double to int Complete the convert() method that casts the parameter from a double to an integer and returns the result. Note that the main() method prints out the returned value of the convert() method.
Ex: If the double value is 19.9, then the output is: 19
Ex: If the double value is 3.1, then the output is: 3.
Explanation:
<h2>plz bhai mera answer ko brainliest kar do..</h2>
Answer:
d) $228,000 outflow
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount that the salaries should be reflected in the analysis
Using this formula
Salaries=Salaries expense-(Salaries expense*Tax rate)
Let plug in the formula
Salaries=$380,000-($380,000*40%)
Salaries=$380,000-$152,000
Salaries=$228,000 Outflow
Therefore salaries should be reflected in the analysis by a: $228,000 outflow
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The reason is that the Internation Financial Reporting Framework says that though there are choices the company must opt to the depreciation method that brings fairness to the financial statement, which means that the method used calculates the depreciation for the year that actually represents the decrease in the value of the assets in market value. So if the current method brings the fairness to the Financial statements, Lucky can use them and if those don't bring fairness to the financial statements then its better to use alternative which will bring the fairness to financial statements.
Answer:
Land (Dr.) $1,800,000
Land Improvements $540,000
Building 2 $660,000
Building 1 demolish expense $346,400
Land grading expense $187,400
Building 3 construction cost $2,242,000
Land 2 improvement cost $168,000
Cash (Cr.) $22,143,800
Explanation:
Mitzu Co. has paid lump sum amount for 2 buildings and land. The building 1 has no value so its value is considered as zero and all the amount will be attributed to land and building 2. The company has also incurred costs for the demolish of building 1 which will be charged in the books of accounts as one off expense.
