Similar--both control economic resources and typically expect a market to rise out of the imperialism.
Difference--settler colonialism the people from the home country make a home in the new colony establishing political, social, and economic systems. In economic imperialism, only a few people from the home country may make a home in the imperial land but mostly the social structure is left alone and even the political structure is left untouched unless it is not kind to the home country. It is focused on resources and markets with businesses often owned by the home country.
Some of the arguments people might have made against the declaration:
"The Seneca Falls Declaration is the most mistaken, shocking and unnatural event ever made in U.S. history, by women. Women belong to their homes, where they can take care of the offspring, her family and her husband. They aren't qualified to vote, nor legislate and don't need to do so since men in their lives already represent their political will, therefore their duty is only to enhance the social status of her husband or men in the family, according to their situation.
Without such a role in society, who, then is going to do the chores at home? Are the lords going to wash the dishes, clean, do the laundry, feed the children and all sort of chores? Such behavior is unacceptable in society and a threat to our most valued traditions, where men by nature and by God's command, are the heads of the family and not vice-versa."
1:Calvin Coolidge
2:Warren Harding
3:Herbert Hoover
I believe your answer is C correct me if I'm wrong. I hope this helps
