I would think D, because you have to stop and read conversations and stuff between characters which brings up more detail
Seems to me that the second option looks as if it were correct. While paraphrasing and summarizing, you are trying to shorten up an original piece of writing. Giving a well developed descriptions of main ideas isn't something to look for in paraphrasing, so that's why the first option is incorrect. In addition, restating basically everything from a text is not called paraphrasing nor summarizing, and that is why I'd rather classify it as copying.
A run-on sentence usually occurs when two separate sentences or clauses are improperly combined. However, unlike sentence fragments, run-on sentences can still be technically grammatically correct. So technically the are bad.
1. Since research papers are usually lengthy, a “table of contents” could help the reader navigate through the paper in an organized way.
2. Headings above each section could provide a simple, clearly defined format that works to break up the dense paper into distinct portions.
