1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulijaS [17]
3 years ago
5

Who was the first white man to set foot in south africa

History
1 answer:
Tema [17]3 years ago
3 0
Hello!

Answer: Morocco.

Good Lessons. =)
You might be interested in
Will give 50 points write an essay describing three innovations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and their e
Tanzania [10]

There were two technological innovations that profoundly changed daily life in the 19th century. They were both “motive powers”: steam and electricity. According to some, the development and application of steam engines and electricity to various tasks such as transportation and the telegraph, affected human life by increasing and multiplying the mechanical power of human or animal strength or the power of simple tools.

Those who lived through these technological changes, felt them to be much more than technological innovations. To them, these technologies seemed to erase the primeval boundaries of human experience, and to usher in a kind of Millennial era, a New Age, in which humankind had definitively broken its chains and was able, as it became proverbial to say, to “annihilate time and space.” Even the most important inventions of the 19th century that were not simply applications of steam or electrical power, such as the recording technologies of the photograph and the phonograph, contributed to this because they made the past available to the present and the present to the future.

The 1850 song, “Uncle Sam’s Farm,” written by Jesse Hutchinson, Jr., of the Hutchinson Family Singers, captured this sense that a unique historical rupture had occurred as a result of scientific and social progress:

Our fathers gave us liberty, but little did they dream

The grand results that pour along this mighty age of steam;

For our mountains, lakes and rivers are all a blaze of fire,

And we send our news by lightning on the telegraphic wires.

Apart from the technological inventions themselves, daily life in the 19th century was profoundly changed by the innovation of reorganizing work as a mechanical process, with humans as part of that process. This meant, in part, dividing up the work involved in manufacturing so that each single workman performed only one stage in the manufacturing process, which was previously broken into sequential parts. Before, individual workers typically guided the entire process of manufacturing from start to finish.

This change in work was the division or specialization of labor, and this “rationalization” (as it was conceived to be) of the manufacturing process occurred in many industries before and even quite apart from the introduction of new and more powerful machines into the process. This was an essential element of the industrialization that advanced throughout the 19th century. It made possible the mass production of goods, but it also required the tight reorganization of workers into a “workforce” that could be orchestrated in various ways in order to increase manufacturing efficiency. Individuals experienced this reorganization as conflict: From the viewpoint of individual workers, it was felt as bringing good and bad changes to their daily lives.

On the one hand, it threatened the integrity of the family because people were drawn away from home to work in factories and in dense urban areas. It threatened their individual autonomy because they were no longer masters of the work of their hands, but rather more like cogs in a large machine performing a limited set of functions, and not responsible for the whole.

On the other hand, it made it possible for more and more people to enjoy goods that only the wealthy would have been able to afford in earlier times or goods that had never been available to anyone no matter how wealthy. The rationalization of the manufacturing process broadened their experiences through varied work, travel, and education that would have been impossible before.


i hope this helps you!!!!! have a good day!!!!! :)

6 0
3 years ago
The Federalist President(s) was (were)
Hoochie [10]

 John Adams for reelection in 1800. Thereafter, the party unsuccessfully contested the presidency through 1816 and remained a political force in some states until the 1820s. Its members then passed into both the Democratic and the Whig parties.

Although Washington disdained factions and disclaimed party adherence, he is generally taken to have been, by policy and inclination, a Federalist-and thus its greatest figure. Influential public leaders who accepted the Federalist label included John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Rufus King, John Marshall, Timothy Pickering, and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney. All had agitated for a new and more effective constitution in 1787. Yet, because many members of the Democratic-Republican party of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison had also championed the Constitution, the Federalist party cannot be considered the lineal descendant of the pro-Constitution, or ‘federalist,’ grouping of the 1780s. Instead, like its opposition, the party emerged in the 1790s under new conditions and around new issues.




3 0
3 years ago
How are you involved in the Federal Government?
julsineya [31]

Answer:

If I am wrong I am very sorry

Explanation:

If you are apart of the three branches of government legislative ,executive and judicial who powers are by the constitution in cogress like the president and the federal courts.

8 0
3 years ago
Was the united states justified in sending troops to the río grande? Why or why not
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

President Polk ordered the commander of the U.S. Army in Texas, Zachary Taylor, to move his forces into the disputed area near the Rio Grande River. The river formed part of the border between Texas and Mexico. Polk sent a representative to Mexico in an effort to re-establish diplomatic relations.

5 0
3 years ago
Identify and explain whether or not India experienced relative progress or decline under British rule.
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

Food shortages came about because Indians were growing cash crops. When famine struck in 1876-77 and 1899-1900 the British system of government was completely overwhelmed and could not organise a big enough relief effort. As well as these massive famines, there were many other smaller, more localised famines.

Explanation:

They forced the commercialisation of agriculture with the growing of various cash crops and the raw materials for the industries in the Britain. With the strong political control, the British were able to monopolise the trade with India. They defeated their foreign rivals in trade so that there could be no competition.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the vietnam war happen even though a lot of people opposed it?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the lasting legacy of the Vietnam conflict
    11·1 answer
  • Rose to power by restoring order in Afghanistan after the war with the Soviet Union.
    7·2 answers
  • What is the tallest skyscraper in the US?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the first continental congress called
    7·2 answers
  • I 1. Why do you think early settlements in the Americas were founded on or near bodies of water?​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following strained Japan’s relations with Western powers in the early 1940s?
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to the empire of Alexander the Great after his death?
    7·2 answers
  • If the Senate passes a version of the budget that is different than the one passed by the House of Representatives, then Congres
    7·2 answers
  • What does the division of power between the branches do?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!