4, 5, 6, hope that helps.
The answer is A. It uses the word farthest, as a word that shows the biggest difference.
It is B that Shakespeare introduces a major conflict. Just took the test.
Answer:
The point the author is trying to make in the article is:
There are many alternatives that can be used to make straws instead of plastic.
Explanation:
Following the need to reduce the environmental footprint of plastic for household items, it is necessary that alternative materials should replace plastic. In the article, the author narrates the huge plastic pollution in recent years, and argues that "cheap and disposable plastic straws should be replaced with reusable stainless steel, glass, or biodegradable paper alternatives."
The correct answer is answer C ("The words with positive connotations soften the ones with negative connotations to create a serious, matter-of-fact tone").
The tone of this excerpt is remarkably pragmatic for speaking about such horrific matter. Machiavelli achieves this by never losing sight of his aim, which is to instruct efficiency. <u>He's very aware of the delicate nature of the subject matter</u>. Without omitting important details even though they may seem cruel or gruesome, he's able to keep a cold tone by neutralizing these negative connotations with positive language.
This effect is made more clear in the last paragraph:
"For <u>injuries</u> ought to be done all at one time, so that, <u>being tasted less,</u> <u>offend less</u>..." - Here he's talking about necessary punishment and mercy at the same time.
"Benefits ought to be given <u>little by little</u>, so that the <u>flavour may last longer</u>..." - Machiavelli is talking about manipulation and using the word flavour which has a positive connotation that softens the cruel nature of the act.
Hope this helps!
