Answer:
The text shows that the animals expected a different outcome than the reality they are facing.
Explanation:
Orwell uses irony in this excerpt by showing how the animals goal at the beginning was to drive Mr. Jones away from the farm and establish there own society, Animalism, but ended in chapter 10 with their original commandments changed to one statement: “ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS. (Four legs good, two legs better.),there is no longer Equality between animals and they are all ruled by their dictator- leader, Napoleon, who (as well as the pigs), begin to act like humans. Here Orwell implies that there is no real difference between the two, which is how he uses irony in this excerpt.
(ps. This is my second time answering so im sorry if i made some mistakes
(,,>﹏<,,)
Answer:
D. It is a fragment and needs a subject.
Explanation:
"Flew through the meadow" describes something that an object does. It doesn't specify a subject and it doesn't make much sense without one. A good example of a subject for this sentence fragment would be "The bird" or "The butterfly", which would make the sentence "The bird/butterfly flew through the meadow." That would be a complete, logical sentence, since an object to perform the given action is present.
The answer is A because it is summarizing and telling what the pargraph is going to be about
Answer:
hello i would like to help Desdemona is a more plausible, well-rounded figure than much criticism has given her credit for. Arguments that see Desdemona as stereotypically weak and submissive ignore the conviction and authority of her first speech (“My noble father, / I do perceive here a divided duty and her terse fury after Othello strikes her (“I have not deserved this” Desdemona is at times a submissive character, most notably in her willingness to take credit for her own murder. In response to Emilia’s question. HOPE IT HELPS :)
Explanation:
Hope it helps :)
Personal Liberty in the United States is the capability of having freedom. For example, a person will have freedom of doing as they please, etc. In Australia, there is freedom of speech, religion, opinion, etc. In some ways, the personal liberty can be similar with The United States and Australia.
