Answer:
This one individual played a great part in creating the industrial north, as well as the plantation south. Eli Whitney's invention made the production of cotton more profitable, and increased the concentration of slaves in the cotton-producing Deep South.
Your answer is individual rights
Answer:
Explanation:
The battle of Midway was fought primarily with airplane, in which the United States decimated Japan's first-line transporter quality and the majority of its best prepared maritime pilots. Together with the Battle of Guadalcanal, the Battle of Midway finished the risk of further Japanese intrusion in the Pacific.
Half year after the assault on Pearl Harbor, the United States vanquished Japan in a standout amongst the most conclusive maritime clashes of World War II. Much obliged to a limited extent to significant advances in code breaking, the United States had the capacity to appropriate and counter Japan's arranged snare of its few outstanding plane carrying warships, delivering perpetual harm on the Japanese Navy. An essential defining moment in the Pacific battle, the triumph permitted the United States and its allies to move into a hostile position.
Allthough i cannot see the picture, romanticism in the 19th century was mostly based on the french revolution, so i would picture it being about bloodshed, murder, or liberty
Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
