1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
2 years ago
7

Formal sanctioning is the process by which a norm becomes a part of an individual’s personality, thus conditioning that individu

al to conform to society’s expectations. True/False
History
2 answers:
viktelen [127]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Marina86 [1]2 years ago
4 0
This statement is false.
The definition which you wrote above doesn't refer to formal sanctioning, but rather to internalization. Formal sanctioning has to do with receiving formal punishment for something wrong an individual has done within a society. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following is true about the Quran
Mars2501 [29]

its option b as told by the messenger...

ans. opt b

7 0
3 years ago
What colony bordered Virginia to the northeast
RideAnS [48]
Maryland bordered Virginia's northeast.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At first, only people that lived in the city were considered citizens.
dusya [7]
This is true because they didn’t think anyone else had rights
3 0
3 years ago
what percentage of Native Americans died as a result of the transfer of European diseases to the new world?
MakcuM [25]
80% is the answer you need
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the consequence of brooks's beating of sumner in the north? The south?
viva [34]

This event is known as the Caning of Charles Sumner, and it took place on May 22, 1856. On this date, Representative Preston Brooks, who was a supporter of slavery, attacked Senator Charles Sumner, who was an abolitionist. He used a cane to do so, leading to the name of the event.

The issue shocked people due to its violence, and it led to the development of even more division between the North and the South. In the North, Brooks was seen as a savage, and Sumner as a martyr. People were enraged, and they believed the episode was an example of the lack of tolerance displayed in the South. On the other hand, the event was supported by many in the South, as they believed it demonstrated the weakness of the Northerners.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a major advantage to the Byzantine Empire's geographic location?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the effects of industrialization socially change the united states
    11·1 answer
  • What was the intent of the coercive Acts?
    14·1 answer
  • The Roman Empire persecuted Christians and Jews for which of the following reasons?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the geography of East Asia benefit the people of ancient China?
    5·2 answers
  • which english writer of the elizibithean age authored the faerie queene an epic poem about knights and virtues
    12·1 answer
  • What does confederacy mean?
    15·2 answers
  • Why did Pericles rebuild Athens?
    12·2 answers
  • Prior to Muhammad, most Arabs practiced <br> . (polytheism/Sufism
    7·2 answers
  • Pagbibigay kahulugan sa mga salita:
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!