I added a picture of a badly-drawn cross as an example to help me explain. Let's say h is the recessive allele, in this case, that would cause a recessive condition. The heterozygous Hh parent is the carrier and they are being crossed with a homozygous dominant HH parent.
As you can see, all of the children are either homozygous dominants HH or heterozygous carriers Hh. None of the children can be homozygous recessive hh because there is not a recessive allele h to inherit from the other parent. Because H is dominant over h, the recessive condition won't be displayed.
Answer: Hasty generalization
Explanation:
Hasty generalization is known to be a type of fallacy in which an individual make conclusion as a result of inadequate facts or information without ascertaining if it is true or not. It is when a person relies on small samples instead of the whole samples in making judgment. It is also known as over generalization fallacy. Thus, it is a decision reached by an individual due to impatience and so on.
The researcher is guilty of of using hasty generalization in reasoning.
I believe the answer is: <span>Availability heuristic
</span><span>Availability heuristic is an occurrence when people choose to rely on simplistic examples to discuss a certain topic rather than choose to analyze it with a more complex method. In news, this would make people attribute social problem to specific group of people or a specific party rather than giving it a full thought.</span>