1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cupoosta [38]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following was NOT a difficulty George Washington faced creating the Continental Army? A. lack of supplies B. volunt

eer soldiers only enlisted for 6 months to one year C. untrained and undisciplined soldiers D. unfamiliar with the geography and terrain
History
2 answers:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is D unfamiliar with the geography and terrain.

stepan [7]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is D. unfamiliar with the geography and terrain.

The Continental Army, lead by George Washington, squared off with the British army during the American Revolution. During this time, the colonists were extremely unorganized, had little supplies, and was staffed by thousands of volunteers.

However the Continental Army did have an advantage in knowing the geography/climate. Considering the volunteer soldiers for the Continental Army lived in the 13 colonies (where the fighting took place) the geography and terrain was very familiar to them.
You might be interested in
What role did economic considerations play in propelling america into war in 1898?
dusya [7]
After the explosion of the USS Maine, the US public was whipped up into an anti-Spanish hysteria. Despite Spain's desire to avoid war and President William McKinley's distaste for war, the yellow press continued feeding the public's appetite for anti-Spanish news. Hawks like then-Assistant Secretary of the Navy Theodore Roosevelt loudly criticized the reluctant McKinley for being weak and afraid.
4 0
3 years ago
Which group contains provisions of the legislation aimed at resolving slavery-related issues? Group A Group B
Sliva [168]

Answer:

Group A

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Clothes and Social Status
forsale [732]

Here is the sample answer:

Feudalism shaped the social structure of the Middle Ages. Under the feudal system, there was a strict social hierarchy. Clothing was a way to display which social class a person represented. Nobles, including lords and ladies, often were dressed in rich colored clothing, sometimes even with golden thread. Dying clothes was expensive at the time; therefore, only the wealthy could afford to have clothing made with vibrant clothes. Peasants wore undyed clothes in browns and grays mostly for two reasons. They were inexpensive, and because they worked the land, dirt was less predominant and they were easier to clean.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When President Trump appoints ambassadors, he is acting as the _______
Kipish [7]

Ambassador is the answer, brainliest?

5 0
3 years ago
How did the fugitive slave law serve to strengthen the south? Pls tell me
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century. Statutes regarding refugee slaves existed in America as early as 1643 and the New England Confederation, and slave laws were later enacted in several of the 13 original colonies. Among others, New York passed a 1705 measure designed to prevent runaways from fleeing to Canada, and Virginia and Maryland drafted laws offering bounties for the capture and return of escaped slaves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, many Northern states including Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut had abolished slavery.

Concerned that these new free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves, Southern politicians saw that the Constitution included a “Fugitive Slave Clause.” This stipulation (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) stated that, “no person held to service or labor” would be released from bondage in the event they escaped to a free state. Despite the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the U.S. Constitution, anti-slavery sentiment remained high in the North throughout the late 1780s and early 1790s, and many petitioned Congress to abolish the practice outright.

Bowing to further pressure from Southern lawmakers—who argued slave debate was driving a wedge between the newly created states—Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.

This edict was similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause in many ways, but included a more detailed description of how the law was to be put into practice. Most importantly, it decreed that slave owners and their “agents” had the right to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states.

In the event they captured a suspected slave, these hunters had to bring them before a judge and provide evidence proving the person was their property. If court officials were satisfied by their proof—which often took the form of a signed affidavit—the owner would be permitted to take custody of the slave and return to their home state. The law also imposed a $500 penalty on any person who helped harbor or conceal escaped slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was immediately met with a firestorm of criticism. Northerners bristled at the idea of turning their states into a stalking ground for bounty hunters, and many argued the law was tantamount to legalized kidnapping. Some abolitionists organized clandestine resistance groups and built complex networks of safe houses to aid slaves in their escape to the North.

Explanation:

basically: Following increased pressure from Southern politicians, Congress passed a revised Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Part of Henry Clay's famed Compromise of 1850—a group of bills that helped quiet early calls for Southern secession—this new law forcibly compelled citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are all of the professional sports of massachusetts?
    10·1 answer
  • Why were there so many american casualties in the civil war?
    11·1 answer
  • During the French and Indian War, France and Great Britain fought for control of North American territory. What impact did the e
    8·2 answers
  • What was the consequence of brooks's beating of sumner in the north? The south?
    14·1 answer
  • Name a contribution to the death rate in Jamestown.
    14·1 answer
  • During the 1950s, the main goal of the civil rights movement was to
    8·1 answer
  • A significant political consequence of the growth of democracy in the united states from 1800 to 1830 was the expansion of suffr
    10·1 answer
  • When you are done, submit your assignment for grading. Please answer the following questions on a Word document with at least 3-
    7·1 answer
  • A case is considered by the Supreme Court only if a certain number of the nine Justices agree to hear it. How many have to agree
    10·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!