The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Answer: They fail simply because the American political system is designed to support only two major parties. As well as this, 48 of the 50 states employ a winner-takes-all system for electoral votes.
Explanation: Third parties often represent an ideology that is considered too radical by the mainstream parties and their constituents.
I think that these are the answers for your questions.
3. B
4. B
Answer:
Many Reasons...
Explanation:
The Trail of Tears was a horrid act by the USA's government. The southerners were hungry for power, and that greatly impacted American History. The migration of the Cherokees opened land to southern cotton farmers, boosting cotton production and an increase of the American economy. Therefore, increasing the south's political power.
