This is a very complex question and the answer truly depends on the person answering the question. In my opinion, the threat of war does not justify unlimited limits on civil liberties. In cases of threat of war, some countries will take extreme actions like limiting their people's access to the news or internet. This is an extreme measure of taking away certain civil liberties. However they may be situations where a government may prevent their people from visiting a country that has made a proven threat of danger to its people or country. To me this is not a violation of civil liberties, it is the government working to clearly protect their people from direct harm.
id anderstand what u mean about it
Assuming u are talking about the picture that Paul Rivera painted about the Boston massacre, the colonial leaders thought he was being propaganda or trying to persuade ppl about what didn't actually happened or he was trying to be biased by supporting one side.
Answer:
(1) Intellectually Disabled; (2) Specific Learning Disability
Explanation: