Answer:
Explanation: Both, like most of the world then and now, was developing an economic depression from hordes of excess labor undercutting wages and depleting resources. Overpopulation was not under control anywhere then and the world had overwhelmed the current technology's ability to access sufficient resources for the expanding hordes of people. So it was once again time for the most desperate to attack neighbors and take their land and resources. WW I had slaughtered some excess people but its stagnant trench warfare did almost nothing to acquire more useful land for anyone.
The people of Italy, Spain, and Germany became interested in Marxist international socialist and fascist national socialist policies in their growing desperation. Because the national socialists promised to protect national industries and its jobs against foreign competition undercutting them, they won the competition between the two radical socialist philosophies.
Italy's Mussolini developed the fascist "corporatist" national socialist structure. It was a more efficient shallow bureaucratic system that "incorporated" each industry under a single government bureau that controlled it.
Spain and Germany copied Italy's model. Italy's economy started improving and it began more conquests south into Africa and east into the Balkans to feed it. Spain became mired with a war against its Marxists who were raging jealous against the national socialist's popularity "stealing" their proletariat from them. Communists from other countries, including the US, entered Spain to help their communists. The German national socialists sided with Franco, Spain's fascist leader, and helped defeat the communists in a fierce civil war made famous by writers like Hemingway.
Germany was the most successful with the system. It was well suited to the traditional German culture's stricter discipline and socialist origins (according to Marx). Their economy improved most rapidly and the world was fascinated at it's initial success until it began its conquest for the land needed by it's expanding population. LIke Greece, Rome, and France before it, it decided to take so much as it could, not just what it needed for the immediate future. The rest is history you should already know.
I hope this helps :D
Fights - death - (was this part of the trading route ??)
Hi kiddo!
So really we have 3 that apply here.
A is a definite yes! Taxes from citizens help pay for needs of the nations. It could be something like building new schools or helping to pay for roadwork.
B also needs to be checked off. This is an obvious yes because it goes hand in hand with A. It helps pay for public needs. Also, just as A said: needs for the nation.
C doesn’t really apply here. I wouldn’t mark this one if I were you. True, it makes consumers have less but by paying their taxes, they get a refund and they will go after what they want. They are consumers.
D doesn’t work either. If anything, taxes help the economy grow! So this is a big no no.
E I would say works. Taxes that are payed help pay for other things. And government programs are one of them.
So really we’re marking A, B, and also E.
I hope my reasoning helped!
Happy studying.
~Brooke❤️
No terrorism is terrorism
Florence was the site of many economic developments. It was witness to new systems of taxation and borrowing during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Trade was a major source of economic success. Moreover, industry was strong due to the implementation of craft guilds. Florence was not dominated by royal courts, like other states. Instead, it was a republic with an elected government. This made the city more frugal in taste, which also meant that the behaviour of people in terms of wealth accumulation and saving was more moderate and humble, contributing to the thriving economy.
