Answer:
the answer is east Asia and Southeast Asia with south Asia ,Persia ,the arabian Peninsula ,east Africa and southern Europe
production means making or producing things....Are their any choices?
The idea that people within a state can and should determine the laws within that state is referred to as <span>popular sovereignty. </span>
<u>Commoners in Hinduism as warriors:</u>
The commoners in Hinduism can become warriors and this does not make them to move up in the caste system.
Neither of the given statements fits to warriors. Anyone can become a warrior and this is not based on the caste system. In Hinduism, the people are grouped according to their habitation.
They had a clear cut vision in grouping that one who imparts knowledge is Brahmins, one who fights and protects people from enemies are Kshatriyas, one who does business is vaishyas and finally one who does the hard labor is shudras.
The warrior from any one of the groups will always remain in the same cult there won’t get upgraded or downgraded in the caste system which is derived according to the habitation. In this grouping, there is no discrimination every individual will practice their system of life.
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves. Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.
This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves.
However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery. Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.
Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
