True. The Bill of Rights DOES limit an individual Plz mark mine as brainliest
Answer:
No, I do not agree with him because not every aggression can be solved with military retaliation, force, or killing in self-defense.
Explanation:
John Locke has a theory of war in which he describes war as being a state of destruction which happens because someone pre-meditated taking another person's life. In his theory, he states that a person may kill another if his life is threatened, in self-defense.
He further argues that war is just and fair because it is a response to aggression and that the aggressor loses his or her rights when he puts people in a state of war and any means can be employed to defeat the enemy because war has no rules.
Perhaps it's all about the destruction that the nation had to face after the war. It did not take long before America recovered from this phase. <span>The transition of some industries to military armament manufacture caught the economy from total lost.</span><span>
</span><span>
</span>
Because the Conneticut plan (the great compromise) consisted of the house of reps. which was based off a states population. and then a Senate which each state was only allowed 2 senators. From what i could tell, the smaller states went along with it figuring that even though they possibly couldnt win in the house of Reps. then there were enough of them to team up in the Senate to block any bill they didnt agree with.
