Not quite sure but I think it is B.
Hope that helps.
Firms can use marginal analysis to dispose the price so the profit maximization occurs. They can reach that from the analysis of fixed costs, variable costs and knowing the real price of the product in the market. Keep in mind that if the total of the costs is very close to the price of the product in the market there will be no profits.
Because the moon is round
Answer:
C
Explanation:
wikipedia says: "The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house or House of Representatives, but required the upper house or Senate to be weighted equally among the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house."
I would say that both of the options are correct. Hope this helps!
