Answer:
Explanation: "Man vs Nature" conflict is an indispensable element of all the genres of literary writing and even in our real life. However, the sources of the conflict keeps varying from text to text. The setting of this conflict in the literary works are often cited as the battle between the two. In the beginning the <em>relentless pursuit of power and agony by the characters make them forget that "nature always fights back" and shows its resistance as it acts a force marring the humans from attempting misdeeds.</em>Then towards the end, there is a confrontation of the character and the nature for their certain hostile actions and later overcoming from the disastrous consequences of the battle in order to restore the world. Some of the classic illustrations of this conflict are <em>"The Fault in the stars",</em> <em>"Scarlet Ibis", "Lord of the flies", "Doctor Faustus", </em>etc. In these works, the nature is shown as the supreme and extreme force retaliating the dangers caused by hostility of the characters and make them bear the effects of these actions and at last restore it for bringing peace to their world.
Answer:it basically how the ocean is better than land
Explanation:
The answer is B. Although it may seem the other answers are correct as well, in fact they are not. A 'complex paragraph' is indeed one which explains multiple sides of an issue, but favors one, thus only one main topic is represented. It doesn't really matter where the topic sentence is placed - it can be anywhere in the paragraph. However, it is traditionally placed in the first sentence, although that rule isn't written in stone - the topic sentence can also be placed at the end of the paragraph. Therefore, we are left with only one option, and that is B, 'a paragraph should have one main topic'.
Answer:
Grace but effortless
Explanation:
Grace but did not practice well
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The first passage uses words such as I and my, indicating this is in the first person point of view. The second passage doesn't use any words likes this, and describes what characters are doing without saying what point of view it's in. This would make the second passage in the third person point of view.
