Juror 4 is being prejudiced and racist against the poor.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Juror 4 ratified his conclusion on the case, being prejudiced against poor people.
- That's because according to this juror, poor people are doomed to commit crimes.
- According to him, these people commit crimes because the region where they live does not have enough resources for them to have a satisfying life, so they start causing problems for society to change that.
This question is about "The 12 Angry Men," which tells how 12 different jurors try a poor foreign man accused of killing his father.
More information:
brainly.com/question/20787326
Answer:
Beautiful face fr I’m also bored
Explanation:
I need the points I’m so broke :(
Answer:
He wanted him to climb even higher up the social ladder and be a lawyer
Explanation:
Explanation:
"When Mr. Pirzada Came to Dine" was written by the famous author Jhumpa Lahiri. In this book the author illustrates the experience shared by by little girl named Lilia who narrates the whole story.
The story takes was set in the autumn of the year 1971 when the two countries, India and Pakistan, were having conflicts with each others. The then called East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was facing a civil war. West Pakistan invaded Dacca and tortured many people destroying many peoples life and killing them.
The story revolves deals with the cultural harmony of the two family, an Indian American and an East Pakistani living in Boston, in the backdrop of India–Pakistan war of 1971.
