1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GenaCL600 [577]
3 years ago
7

One of the reasons the court ruled against napster was:

History
1 answer:
kodGreya [7K]3 years ago
8 0
<span>a. it knowingly encouraged and assisted in the infringement of copyrights

The specific language of the appeals court ruling against Napster in 2001 stated that Napster "</span>knowingly encourages and assists its users to infringe the record companies' copyrights." The official case was <span>A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the ruling that had been made by the US District Court for the Northern District of California.</span>
You might be interested in
Which colony was the last one to officially send delegates to Philadelphia?
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

phx arizona

Explanation:

no u

5 0
4 years ago
There are distinct separations between each level of political party organization.
Studentka2010 [4]
No, it is false that there are distinct separations between each level of political party organization, and it is generally false that polls <span>are always an accurate measure of public opinion, since there is a high degree of variance. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
When people are united by common history and culture, they belong to a __________. A. state B. nation C. territory D. boundary
777dan777 [17]
When people are united by common history and culture, they belong to a "nation" although this is not technically the case. Many people from different backgrounds and cultures can be part of a nation.
5 0
3 years ago
I need some help with an upcoming test. I was wondering if you could give me some resources to use/study.
crimeas [40]

Answer:

you can do it.;)

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
Aleks [24]

Answer:

One short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims is the mutual defense alliance against their common enemies which only lasted until more Englishmen including both Puritans and non-religious settlers had arrived in New England, tipping the balance of power in favor of the English.

Explanation:

Hope that this helps you out! :)

Have a good rest of your day/night!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List 5 european countries that built large maritime empire between 1450-1750
    5·1 answer
  • Who approached Spain for navigation rights to the Mississippi River?
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the first woman to complete the coursework for a doctorate at harvard university
    13·1 answer
  • What is the fourth amendment
    15·2 answers
  • Who was Socrates and why is he looked up to?
    9·1 answer
  • New discoveries concerning otzis genetic history centralidea
    10·1 answer
  • What was a major reason the North defeated the South in the Civil War? (SSUSH9a)
    11·1 answer
  • The Meaning of freedom – Colonists, Servants, and Slaves
    11·1 answer
  • 4. What stereotypes of American Indians did you observe in the portrayals of Tonto? Be specific (15
    8·1 answer
  • The creation of which of the following allowed merchant firms to hold money on account
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!