The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Answer:
The statements best reflects Gladden's ideas as expressed in The rich have a moral Christian duty to help the poor. The rapid increase in wealth is the cause of poverty. The christian duty is to help the poor.
Washington Gladden was the leader of the movement and the supporters of the movement believed in the duty of the help of the poor and help the society rise equally. Hence these statements prove that the social Gospel movement were true.
I believe postulates are given or assumed true statements without a proof. And a theorem can be proven. You do this in geometry if I remember correctly.
Answer:
£4,250, £5,980 and Granite
Explanation:
