Answer:
global warming
Explanation:
The global warming is believed to be able to affect the global climate through warming it up. It is mostly the emissions of greenhouse gasses that are considered to be responsible for it, such as the carbon dioxide and methane, but in reality it is the natural factors that have the leading role by far.
The releasing of these gasses into the atmosphere by the humans since the Industrial Revolution has caused rise in the amount of these gasses into the atmosphere, rise that is more rapid than the natural increase of it. The world has been in panic lately as it has been noticed that the global temperatures are on the rise, and that it may have catastrophic consequences for the humanity.
In practice though, it turned out that only one of the projections about the climate changes was accurate, that being the Russian model, which was also the least dramatic one, while all the other models were predicting dramatic changes, but that didn't happened. Also, the panic about the catastrophic effects of it are also way to exaggerated, as a global warming, as the geologic evidence shows, will actually make the climate much more equalized, with the extremes in temperatures largely minimized, and having much more wet and green planet. The only real problem is that big portion of the human population will need to be relocated on slightly higher ground as the sea levels will rise.
1 = Southern Europe
2= Western Europe
3 = scandavia
4 = Eastern Russia
The answer is: the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.
From an examination of the displacement of the ground surface which accompanied the 1906 earthquake, Henry Fielding Reid, Professor of Geology at Johns Hopkins University, concluded that the earthquake must have involved an "elastic rebound" of previously stored elastic stress.
The elastic rebound theory is an explanation for how energy is spread during earthquakes. As rocks on opposite sides of a fault are subjected to force and shift, they accumulate energy and slowly deform until their internal strength is exceeded.
I think Nigeria is the answer.
Answer: A.
The amount of violence has been decreasing, so few people have been killed.
Explanation:
The "War on Drugs" does indeed see the U.S. government spending more than $500 million a year as they raid supply chains and arrest traffickers to stem the flow of drugs into the U.S.
Most of the violence does occur near the U.S.-Mexico border as gangs fight to control smuggling routes and U.S. agents attempt to stop them along with police officer, most of whom are dedicated to ending drug smuggling.
The violence however has not been decreasing. Indeed, cartels have become more violent and with the rise of new cartels like the New Jalisco cartel, the violence has spread.
