1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Deffense [45]
3 years ago
15

. In what sequence are the rooms visited on the tour?

History
1 answer:
Svetach [21]3 years ago
3 0
Bottom to top.......
You might be interested in
Which statement correctly describes how Eleanor Roosevelt handled the position of First Lady? A. She stayed in the White House t
Anastaziya [24]
The best answer from the list would be "<span> B. She travelled the country visiting people affected by the Great Depression" but she of course did many other things as well. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How old is Elie when the story begins?
kirill [66]
What story and who is ellie?!?!?
3 0
2 years ago
The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0
3 years ago
Please help History questions.
zimovet [89]

Answer:

The two themes I choose:

- <u>Separation of Powers</u>

The "Separation of Powers" states that governmental powers are to be evenly split between "x" amount of branches, x being determined by the Founding Fathers. Each of these branches are given a certain power (or job) that they need to do. For example, The Powers were separated and given to 3 branches:

Executive Branch: This branch is has the power to create a bill, as well as veto, line-veto, give ideas on what to change in a bill, create diplomatic relations with countries, ask congress to start wars, set up Judicial Judges.

Legislative Branch: This branch has the power to create bills, pass the bill, declare war, regulate commerce, control taxation and spending policies, veto or approve Judicial Judges.

Judicial Branch: This branch has the power to impeach Presidents, declare a law or bill as unconstitutional, have the last word on cases that reaches the Supreme Court.

- <u>Checks and Balances</u>

As stated above, there are 3 branches. Each of these branches (I will reiterate what i said) have the powers over the other, so as to not be able to overstep their bounds. Think of it as a triangle, in which they have more power and less power than the others.

<u>Executive Branch</u>:

<u>Powers</u>:

Veto/Pass Bills

Instate Judges

Start relations with other countries

<u>Weakness</u>:

Can be impeached

Veto can be overturned by Congress; Bills passed can be overturned by the Supreme Court

Must ask Congress to start wars if relations turn sour

<u />

<u>Legislative Branch:</u>

<u>Powers</u>:

Able to pass laws

Able to declare war

Able to regulate country and foreign commerce

Able to control taxes and how the government spends its funds

<u>Weakness</u>:

Congressmen & women can be replaced

Laws passed can be vetoed/declared unconstitutional

<u>Judicial Branch</u>:

<u>Powers</u>:

Life long term if appointed unless... (which would be put in weakness)

Able to declare laws unconstitutional

Able to have final word in how laws would be interpreted

<u>Weaknesses:</u>

Judges can be replaced

Rulings can be changed if the law is changed later on

4 0
2 years ago
5. Two presidents walked to their ceremonies. Which of the following was one of them? *
Korolek [52]
I’m sorry if I get this wrong but James K. Polk
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which document states that it is the right of the citizens to overthrow their government if it no longer represents the “common
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP :( true or false
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the limitations of Progressivism?
    12·1 answer
  • What is beelzebubs plan in paradise lost?
    10·1 answer
  • To what sense do the "haunches" of Sandburg's poem "Fog" appeal?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the beginning of bilingual education in the 1960s change the curriculum of some Texas schools?​
    15·2 answers
  • When did napoleon iii became emperor
    13·1 answer
  • How did the fall of the Soviet Union affect the world in the long run?
    15·2 answers
  • What iseaning of hi​
    9·2 answers
  • How did the lives of german speaking immigrants change?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!