1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
11

Which U.S. action would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine than under

History
1 answer:
Kamila [148]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. Providing weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow a foreign communist government would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine that under the foreign policy of detente.

Explanation:

The Reagan Doctrine was a Cold War foreign policy doctrine of President Ronald Reagan, by which the United States sought to diminish the international influence of Communists. Although the doctrine was followed for less than a decade, it was at the heart of US foreign policy from the early 1980s until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

In practice, the doctrine meant US assistance to anti-communist guerrilla and resistance movements in countries supported by the Soviet Union in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Its purpose was to reduce the influence of the Soviet Union and to create the conditions for capitalism and democratic governance. For example, support was given to Contra-guerrillas in Nicaragua and Islamist Mujahden-guerrillas in Afghanistan.

You might be interested in
Which was part of the Colombian exchange?
meriva

Answer:

Trading good was apart of the Colombian. Stuff like trading horses, sugar plants, Tabaco but not only goods it also came with disease  

5 0
3 years ago
The initiative is.....
vodomira [7]

I believe an Initiative is C. A vote on a legislative measure.

7 0
3 years ago
Which innovation made WWI casualties higher than any other previous war?
Llana [10]
A)a new defensive tactic known as trench warfare

Trench warfare allowed the war to drag on for long periods of time because of the stalemates that ensue from the opposing armies refusing to give up the land under their controls, resulting in high casualties in no man's land.


Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
100 pts & Brainliest!!!
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

Explanation:

As the stories are passed down they are probably details that are added or lost. Also, everyone is different so people experience and see things differently over the course of time. Along with the discovery of new perspectives and evidence

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Farming was France's main purpose for settling in the New World
    12·2 answers
  • What was the last area conquered by the Muslims​
    11·2 answers
  • have you people heard about the text from the government? i swear they know the aliens are gonna come on over here and party
    7·1 answer
  • What was the main goal of the American Indian Movement?
    11·1 answer
  • In what alphabet is this excerpt written in?
    5·1 answer
  • List some of the beliefs that the Sumerians held about their gods?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the reign of terror in France
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPP
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Knights were born into their position in society. True or False
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the 19 president
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!