Answer: C. Eugene can claim to know everything but still not know everything, a behavior which may fit better as a teenager, thus making him it more believably human.
Explanation:
You didn't give the passage where you got the options from and I couldn't get it online as well but based on some information gathered online, the answer is option C.
The option that summarizes the advantage(s) of the program's teen persona is that Eugene can claim to know everything but still not know everything, a behavior which may fit better as a teenager, thus making him it more believably human.
Therefore, the correct option is C.
Answer:
Explanation: With its gold depleted, the German government attempted to buy foreign currency with German currency, equivalent to selling German currency in exchange for payment in foreign currency, but the resulting increase in the supply of German marks on the market caused the German mark to fall rapidly in value.Mar 15, 2021
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
Without a list composed, i cannot give a certain answer. But a question that is too narow could be like "Where does pine grow?"
Basically it would be a question that will not require too much detail.
