1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
5

What is a difference between interpreting timelines and interpreting historical narratives?

History
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the analysis done is on dates, times and places, very specific information, and their organization throughout time. Whereas in historical narratives, you can analyze dates, but what you do mostly is analyze the in-depth information on an event that took place under a specific time, or place.

Explanation:

A historical timeline, as mentioned before, has the specific purpose of showing the timeframe, and order, in which events during a specific period, took place. There is no deeped analysis on the information, but very superficial. However, in narratives, what the analyzer does is too look with much more emphasis on the details, and specific information, regarding a historical event, or historical narration, of an event. This is the main difference between timelines and hisorical narratives.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
____ founded a school that became a center for Torah studies. a. Johanan ben Zakkai c. Antiochus b. Alexander the Great d. Abrah
sdas [7]
The correct answer is A) Johanan Ben Zakkai. Hope this helps.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who helped the colonists in the French and Indian War?
Nastasia [14]
The British and France went to war the Indians helped out.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What theme is expressed in both these excerpts?
sdas [7]

Answer:

(there's nothing there)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should Mao deserve credit or
miskamm [114]

this could go either way, he brought a lot of destruction and militancy and many died by his hand, but his support from the working class was so great for a reason, he should get credit for the positive reforms he instituted in taking care of people who had been previously exploited, and blame for the collateral damage that ensued as well as his totalitarian methods

6 0
4 years ago
In a three- to five-paragraph essay, evaluate the following argument: "It was wrong for the United States to form an alliance wi
Nikitich [7]
It was wrong of the US to create an alliance with the Soviet Union because they did not support democracy or free trade. 

It was right of the US to create an alliance with the Soviet Union because they were a willing ally against violence dictatorships and they were willing to support a people's choice in government. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • State responses similar to those discussed in the source are an example of what historical development of the 19th and 20th
    7·1 answer
  • . A bicameral legislature features
    7·2 answers
  • The Wolf and the Seven Little Goats" by the Brothers Grimm (Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm)
    14·2 answers
  • Ito ay pagdarasal ng limang beses ng muslim sa isang araw
    15·1 answer
  • 2
    8·1 answer
  • 6. If you were Japanese-American, would you have responded in the same way as the Japanese-Americans
    14·1 answer
  • भोजपत्र एक प्रकारको लेकाली जातको रुखको ...... हो ।​
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Protestants and the Catholic Church could not resolve their difference to keep the Church united?
    7·1 answer
  • 7.
    11·1 answer
  • Why is Oman trying to develop its tourism and manufacturing sectors? To provide
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!