I- this is my favorite question on brainly fs.!
Answer:
1. The Grand Council decided that a majority of each group in the colonies, the representatives of the Proprietors. the Commons House of Assembly to represent the people, but the Lowcountry elite maintained more power than the backcountry.
2. The colonists felt ignored by the Lords Proprietors and saw them as an absentee landlord who never came to Carolina collected rent and offered them little protection from the Native Americans.
3. because of the king’s desire to control the wealth or to limit the independence of the colony.
4. South Carolina had self-government through a representative assembly and now a royal governor appointed by the king. The power of the royal governor was limited in South Carolina because colonial assemblies controlled the taxes that paid the governor’s salary.
5. The English government increased subsidies(bonuses) for naval stores and allowed merchants to sell rice directly to foreign countries.
6. The English government through the royal governor established townships in the backcountry to encourage migration.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Townshend Acts would use the revenue raised by the duties to pay the salaries of colonial governors and judges, ensuring the loyalty of America's governmental officials to the British Crown. However, these policies prompted colonists to take action by boycotting British goods
He angered the Stalwarts by giving reformers patronage jobs.
In a historic ruling handed down on June 27, 2013, the Supreme Court declared that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional and that the federal government cannot discriminate against married lesbian and homosexual couples when deciding federal benefits and protections.
<h3>What is the United States v. Windsor case?</h3>
A significant same-sex marriage civil rights case heard by the US Supreme Court was Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013). The Defense of Marriage Act's (DOMA) Section 3 was found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause because it forbade the federal government from recognizing same-sex unions.
Asserting that Windsor compensated her for her harm in the lower court and that there was no debate because the Government-backed her claim, Justice Scalia dissented in concurrence with Justice Thomas and Chief Justice Roberts.
Learn more about the United States v. Windsor case here:
brainly.com/question/19882758
#SPJ1
