In the 1600's Imperialism was based around colonization in the Americas and establishing trade in the east. During this period the Americas were being colonized intensely by the Europeans that were racing to gain as much land and prestige as possible. In the east, however, the main goal was to reach the Spice Islands (modern day Indonesia) and establish trade routes for the spices the Europeans desperately craved. Comparatively, in the 1900's Imperialism consisted of taking up land in places such as India, Africa, and Southeast Asia. This was done in a "mission to civilize" meaning it was less about economics and now a more political and racial element were used to justify European conquest.
Hope this helps M8
Pope Alexander didn't want two catholic countries fighting eachother. Portugal <span>and Spain were fighting over the New World.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
</span>
Well for starters even though Africans were slaves back than, mostly in the south, they were later on freed in many lands since Lincoln became president, but even though Africans were freed, a declaration or so called law was made of where they all had to go back to their masters to help with the cotton, and so some hid in places, and the ones hidden were found later on, but Africans were discriminated because they were black and not white, so this made people feel superior to blacks (racism), and blacks were discriminated also because since they use to be slaves, people still treated them like ones since they couldn't get as much money as them or they didn't look like them, so black people again were discriminated because of their skin and nationality.
They meant that Hamilton didn’t have Congressional approval for what he was trying prove, and people didn’t vote for what he was trying to prove.
We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead! :)
</span>