Answer:
Correct options
A.) the $4 in direct costs she would spend to drive to and from her babysitting job:
Emily will have to spend $2 to and $2 on gas for the babysitting job. She will have to consider if she can bear the additional cost compared to the other job opportunity.
B.) the opportunity costs of not working at the store on a Saturday when she babysits:
When Emily is babysitting she has to consider the opportunity cost of working at the retail store. The fact the she will not have to drive to work, instead working at a place close to her home.
Incorrect option
C.) the cost of clothes and personal items (e.g., phone) Emily uses during babysitting:
On both jobs Emily will incur cost of clothing and other personal items, so this is not a cost she should be considering in making a decision between the two jobs.
Answer:
Bank Reconciliation Statement as at October 2:
Balance as per checkbook $601
Add: Electronic transfer $2,400
Interest $4
Less: Bank charge ($5)
Balance as per bank statement $3,000
Explanation:
A bank reconciliation statement is a statement prepared periodically to reconcile the balance in the cash book with the balance shown on a bank statement.
The process starts with identifying transactions that do not (do) appear in the cash book and those that do not (do) appear in the bank statement, which did not appear in the other. Errors are also identified and corrected during the process. After this, the reconciliation statement is prepared to agree the two sources of balances.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (a) The court probably found that the state law was unconstitutional under the supremacy cause.
Explanation:
Solution
From the given questions it states that, What would be the court's most likely response to Ralph's lawsuit.
The court's decision response would be that, I that when the situation arises or occurs in that case, where there is a conflict which arises between federal and state law then in that case federal law must be applied.
Constitutions and, more specifically, anti-discrimination statutes represent public policy about equal employment opportunity (EEO).
These laws are in place at the federal, state, and local levels in the United States.
In terms of the employers or other entities they cover, the specific groups of people they defend, the transactions they regulate, and the kind and scope of legal remedies they offer, EEO laws differ widely from one location to another. When businesses engage employees, the philosophical idea of EEO is implied, at the very least.
WHAT IS AN "OPPORTUNITY" FOR WORK?
U.S. EEO rules forbid discrimination in terms and circumstances of employment on the basis of specified characteristics. As a result, "opportunities" can be found in a variety of employment circumstances, such as:
- both inside and outside.
- application forms for jobs.
- interviewing potential employees.
- pre-employment examinations
- inquiries into backgrounds.
- Hiring.
- Compensation.
- Benefits.
- Employee services or perks (sometimes known as perquisites).
- working circumstances.
To learn more about equal employment opportunity from the given link.
brainly.com/question/27853265
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option C, Double taxation on profits and individuals
Explanation:
The disadvantages of the corporation form of ownership are as follows -
a) It takes lot of time and hence is time consuming
b) The taxation gets double
c) Also, the formalities/protocols are very tough
Hence, the option C is correct
