Answer:
By informing the community. Human trafficking victims benefit from discussions, projects, campaigns, and events such as support camps because they learn about their rights, the laws that apply to them, and the organizations that can help them get justice. People can help victims of human trafficking by increasing awareness through discussions, projects, campaigns, and events. People have knowledge or comprehension of human rights violations when they are aware of the problem. They can form an opinion and, eventually, an initiative or a proposal to help fix the situation based on this knowledge.
<em>Hope this helped! Have a great day or night wherever you are, stay safe!</em>
Answer:yes; for a homicide (generally either murder or manslaughter) but self-defense will be a successful defense strategy in seeking dismissal of the charge by the prosecution or the court or an acquittal at trial.
Explanation:
Answer:
Secret service are known to protect the president (in office) and his/her family. There are different fields in secret service.
Answer:
The thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.
Explanation:
Debt Trafficking:
When the human traffickers perform illicit relocation of the women saying them to pay off their debt after starting working at new location in some honorable business, But on their relocation, they force them into the prostitution business to pay their unlawful debt.
Debt Bondage:
It is debt which some labor contractor pays to some person and in return the person willingly delivers his services to pay his debt to the contractor
Debt Peonage:
It is the debt which first person pays to the second person and if the second person remains unsuccessful in paying his debt, the first person forces the second person to work for him at some minimal wage rate. In this way the second person becomes the victim of debt peonage.
After understanding the aforementioned concepts of three different types of debts, we conclude that the thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.
Answer:
B!!!!!
Explanation:
The Court most recently cited Terry v. Ohio in Arizona v. Johnson. In that 2009 case, the Court ruled 9–0 in favor of further expanding Terry, granting police the ability to frisk an individual in a stopped vehicle if there is reasonable suspicion to believe the individual is armed and dangerous.
